Tuesday 27 August 2013

Southwark Council will not prosecute



My hotly anticipated blog post why Southwark Council will never prosecute a TRA or similar organisation, who is stealing funds,  ( Suicide and bad Press has a alot to do with it, infact they let a convicted peadophile Chair one at one time ) if you are on the Dole join the TRA today EASY MONEY.

Post  Coming soon

Thursday 15 August 2013

Colover and Hewson views on NAMBLA?

Barrister Robert Colover and Barbara Hewson what are your views on NAMBLA?

 you know the North American Man Boy Association

Who is NAMBLA? #TellSomebody

Who or What is NAMBLA?
 National Association of Marlon Brando Look Alikes right? No

A organised peadophile group.


The North American Man/Boy Love Association (NAMBLA) is a pedophile and pederasty advocacy organization in the United States that works to abolish age of consent laws criminalizing adult sexual involvement with minors,[2][3] and for the release of all men who have been jailed for sexual contacts with minors that did not involve coercion.



What is GSA (Genetic Sexual Attraction)? oh the Incest lobby coming for ya, watch out for my next post.


Sunday 11 August 2013

Southwark Council; Out of Touch




Hall & Oates; Out of Touch,

always loved this song, the title reminds me of Southwark Council really, the Resident Involvement side, getting paid to do job then just do as little as possible and leave the large bulk to the unpaid volunteers.

Unpaid Community Volunteer: 'please it appears we have a racist bully on the commitee who has influenced the regular meeting attendees, to keep him in, and lets comments fly ' all the black people get council housing' some of us are afraid to approach him and feel unsafe, can you use your position as Resident Involvement Officer to do something'

Resident Involvement Officer: 'No, you have to have a  meeting with him'

Unpaid Community Volunteer: ' I don't think you understand,he is very intimidating.

Resident Involvement Officer: Yes I understand but it's something you gotta deal with.

Unpaid Community Volunteer: Yeah but your paid, what I am asking is within your remit to deal with, you could you your capacity as a Resident Involvement Officer to investigate.

Resident Involvement Officer: Oh okay, listen I will have have to have a  meeting with my manager.

Unpaid Community Volunteer: When will that be?

Resident Involvement Officer: well, I have to email her first it will take a few weeks.

Unpaid Community Volunteer:  So in the meantime what do I do about the racism and bullying.

Resident Involvement Officer:  well umm, I 'll get back to you

{meanwhile the racist bully, siphons of funds meant from the community,and bully people, resident involvement/southwark council fully aware }



Saturday 10 August 2013

My TRA Experience



............................................ 'TRA's must police themselves' said some menopausal woman to me, Oh really leaving the offending TRA to examine their own behaviour, that is stupid and unjust' I replied Southwark Council should actively take a role in being the overarching body.................................

More to come in my upcoming post My TRA Experience


TRA = Tenants & Residents Association

Friday 9 August 2013

Robert Colover and Barbara Hewson SHOULD MARRY


Robert Colover and Barbara Hewson would make a lovely couple don't cha think,



And


Barbara Hewson


It must be: LOVE


Same profession and same beliefs, they should have a wedding make Nancy Friday and Susan Clancy bridemaids and invite the whole NAMBLA as Wedding guests.





Barrister Barbara Hewson defends Barrister Robert Colover.

In typical fashion Barrister Barbara Hewson defends Barrister Robert Colover.

'it takes two to tango. Disgusting tho' these men are, frankly the girls are often not much better - and no shrieking martyrs.'

I think a lot of people in the legal system hold similar beliefs but have just not openly asserted them now it all make sense why these nonces get slap on the wrists sentences and are able to apply remove themselves from the Sex Offender's Register after five years, yep nonce can get their name of the Sex Offender's list after five a lot of non-sex offender people are not aware of that, it all a passive form paedophile acceptance.

I am telling you the UK chapter of NAMBLA must be jumping for joy.




Wednesday 7 August 2013

Remove Barrister Robert Colover SIGN THE PETITION



Remove Barrister Robert Colover from the Bar IMMEDIATELY.

Barrister Robert Colover



Remove any Judge, Police Officer and Barrister that make 'paedophile positive comments' paedophilia is not healthy for any society I do not care how many Freud books you read, what they did in Ancient Greece and what they still do in uncontacted primitive villages around the Globe for a modern healthy society paedophilia must not be condoned.

Barrister Robert Colover made the following statement in court about a 13 year girl who was sexually abused by a 41 year old man.

'The girl is predatory in all her actions and she is sexually experienced'

Sign the petition below :


Crown Prosecution Service @cpsuk: take action over “sexual predator” court comments


  • Petition by
    Nottingham, United Kingdom

  • Trigger warning: this petition text contains references to sexual assault that may be triggering to survivors.
    On Monday, a man walked free from Snaresbrook Crown Court despite pleading guilty to ‘sexual activity with a child’ after the prosecutor Robert Colover and judge Nigel Peters described the thirteen year-old victim as a “sexual predator”.
    I'm a survivor of childhood sexual abuse. I could have been that 13 year old girl who the judge and prosecutor descrbed as 'predatory'. Now, I work with other women who have survived similar experiences. I have seen first hand how this kind of victim blaming prevents women from coming forward and protects men who commit these crimes.
    It’s unacceptable that the Crown Prosecutor - the person who this young girl was relying on to help get her justice - used this kind of language in court. It’s a sad fact that this kind of attitude is commonplace within society and the legal establishment. We need to make a stand and send a clear message: It’s never the child’s fault.
    I’m calling on the Crown Prosecution Service to look at the language used by Robert Colover and meet urgently with our organisation and other groups working with victims of rape and sexual assault to ensure this never happens again.
    Please join me.
    Jo





    Sunday 4 August 2013

    female paedophiles are more dangerous

     I have have always been critical into why female perpetrators of paedophilia get off so lightly, sexual assault of a child should carry with it an obligatory prison sentence.

    Kalee Warnick, 22


    Arrested for allegedly having sexual contact with one of her 15-year-old students at Wall Township High School, where she is a 9th-grade English teacher.



    If this story turns out to be true ,which I believe it is, she will just get a slap on the wrist like Debra LaFave she may lose her teaching licence but she will not serve a custodial sentence, female paedophiles and sex offenders are rarely punished harshly, even though they are more dangerous, than their male counterparts.

    Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2383950/Teacher-22-arrested-allegedly-having-sex-15-year-old-student.html#ixzz2azR35oga 
    Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook


    A jog down memory lane from 2002 the female nonce that is

    Debra LaFave



    'peadophiles and sex offenders come in all shapes and sizes'

    Debra LaFave was 'just too pretty for prison' Whatever!!!

    Debra LaFave was a middle school teacher in Florida in 2002, she was charged with peadophilia, raping her students, when it came to trial everything but the offence she commited, was talked about her bad childhood, bipolar disorder etc, she ended up with probation, on house arrest and had her teachers licence revoked, but was still free to go with her life after she raped children.
    Debra LaFave should have been sent to prison.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Debra_Lafave


    Amy Hickson Peadophile and Zoophile





    Amy Hickson of Greys Farm Close, New Cheriton, Alresford, Hampshire 
    Admitted 13 counts of making and possessing child pornography and extreme animal pornography - including eight charges of making indecent images of a child - with one count involving 596 images - one charge of an making indecent pseudo photographs of a child, and two counts of possessing indecent photos of a child.  She also admitted two counts of possessing extreme pornographic images involving animals, with one charge relating to 15 ‘extreme, disgusting or obscene’ images involving dogs.  The court heard the images showed sexual acts being carried out in an 'explicit or realistic' manner. 

    All of the offences took place between June 2011 and February 2013.  During this period Hickson would have been a teenager and as young as 17. 


                                  She will be sentenced on 6 March 2015.


    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2936607/Woman-faces-jail-possessing-extreme-animal-porn-600-indecent-images-children-just-17.html


    I’m quite the leftist and I cannot stand Ben Sarpiro he is homophobic and transphobic, I do not like the way he is trying to infer that homosexuality is the same as incest. No one is a bigot for recoiling from and hating incest how can you call it incestphobia  moral relativism at its finest.



















    Friday 2 August 2013

    RIP Daniel Pelka, sign the petition

    Change the law to better protect vulnerable children like Daniel Pelka

  • Petition by
    Manchester, United Kingdom





  • This four year old child was starved and mistreated in full view of his primary school teachers and teaching assistants, who observed his desperate attempts to forage for food, his severe weight-loss and the numerous bruises on his body, before he was killed by his mother and step-father.
    Daniel Pelka's ordeal is all too reminiscent of the circumstances surrounding Baby Peter, in which many people in responsible positions - in this case teachers, teaching assistants, an education officer, social workers and police as well as other adults who came into regular contact with Daniel - could have intervened and prevented the tragedy, but failed to take the necessary action to save his life.
    Wouldn't it help if we had a law like France (and many other civilised countries – see appendix below), where it is a crime to stand by and not take sufficient action to help someone who is clearly in distress?
    Along with many others, I find it incomprehensible that Daniel's teachers and teaching assistants did not do more to help him. I am pleased to see today that the MP for Coventry North West, Geoffrey Robinson, has publicly expressed his anger at Daniel’s school and at social services, calling for the resignation of key individuals. “Bureaucracy triumphed over common sense, care, and compassion”, Geoffrey Robinson told Sky News “people seeing a kid beaten, starved to death in our own country...you can’t just say there is nothing we can do about it."
    I am seeking a change in the law with regard to 'duty of care' as demonstrated - or not demonstrated - by the adults surrounding Daniel Pelka through the months leading up to his death. One way in which we can better protect children is to make those around them legally responsible – if an individual is able to help, then the law should require them to do so, as it does in other countries. I have already asked my MP Ann Coffey to raise this issue in Parliament.
    As with Baby P, Daniel was let down by all of the relevant agencies. Staff at his school did little to help him and social services say they were "deceived by a devious mother" - the evidence was there for anyone who cared to look, in the shape of this starving and beaten child. The fact that an education officer called at Daniel's home and saw his mother but not Daniel is also quite impossible to understand. How can a potential case of abuse or neglect be investigated if the child in question is not seen? 
    We need to ensure that adults with a duty of care come to the aid of vulnerable children, in this case to the aid of a child who could be seen to be literally struggling to survive. If those around Daniel had been legally obliged to help him, then perhaps the system would not have let him down him as it so tragically did.
    A full investigation into how our education and social services systems failed Daniel is now underway; its findings will be considered by David Cameron, Nick Clegg and Chris Grayling (amongst others). Now is the time to petition to change the law so that adults in the UK have a legal obligation as well as a moral responsibility to look out for, protect and safeguard the well-being of children in their care or sphere, so that we are able to better protect vulnerable children in the future.
    As Nick Clegg said this morning "Clearly people must have seen something was wrong with this boy, I think his death should be on all of our consciences."
    Please sign my petition in memory of Daniel Pelka.

    Appendix - duty of care, by definition:
    Parents have a duty to rescue their minor children... also applies to those acting in loco parentis, such as schools or babysitters.
    Criminal law [edit]
    In some countries, there exists a legal requirement for citizens to assist people in distress, unless doing so would put themselves or others in harm's way. As of 2012, there were such laws in countries including[1]Albania, Andorra,[24] Argentina,[25] Austria,[26] Belgium, Brazil, Bulgaria, Croatia,[27] Czech Republic, Denmark, Finland, France,[28] Germany,[29] Greece, Hungary, Iceland, Israel, Italy, the Netherlands, Norway, Poland,[30] Portugal, Russia, Serbia, Spain, and Switzerland.